- From: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:26:36 +0200
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Antonio Tapiador del Dujo <atapiador@dit.upm.es>, public-fedsocweb@w3.org
Hi Melvin, On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > main point i wanted to make was to encourage the use linked data practices Sure, despite the fact that 'user address' has the word address in it, it's not an attempt to reinvent the URI or the URL. Rather, it is based on both URIs and URLs. Also, "under the hood" it's based 100% on linked data and follow-your-nose. > will tone things down a bit too :) </rant> no worries! :) i know i sometimes say things that provoke discussion, it's a natural process as far as i'm concerned. i think we should take the good parts from what the w3c produces, add the good parts of what ietf, other bodies, and also the various grassroots mailing lists produce, put it all together in a generous way, and (as Eran said in the blog post you referred to), if we really believe in 'rough consensus and running code', then maybe github (and similar code-hosting sites) should be where open web technology is developed. Putting some code on github is all i did here. And since it's "polyglot", we can easily adapt it to multiple syntaxes, whether they are w3c-approved or ietf-approved or not approved at all. Regardless of the syntax, 'follow-your-nose' and URIs/URLs are always the basis. Whether you publish rdf-over-http or xrd-over-http, we can still all be friends. :) Cheers, Michiel
Received on Monday, 30 July 2012 11:27:13 UTC