- From: Adam Retter <adam@exist-db.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:34:48 +0000
- To: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
- Cc: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, EXPath <public-expath@w3.org>, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, XPath <w3c-xsl-query@w3.org>, XSL Working Group <w3c-xsl-wg@w3.org>
On 14 March 2013 11:25, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This looks tempting. However my only concern is that if this binary
>> module is adopted as built in for some future version of
>> XPath/XQuery/XSLT then it would be more natural to allow to use
>> functions without namespace prefixes. By removing binary- prefix we will
>> get naming clashes with several existing XPath functions.
>
> Maybe it could be adopted similar to the Math (and, potentially, Map
> and Array) functions, which have their own namespace and prefix?
Personally I would prefer that.
--
Adam Retter
eXist Developer
{ United Kingdom }
adam@exist-db.org
irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2013 13:35:19 UTC