Re: Comment on "Allow both xs:base64Binary and xs:hexBinary as arguments" from Jirka Kosek on 2013-07-03 (public-expath@w3.org from July 2013)

From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 22:44:16 +0200
To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
CC: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>, EXPath CG <public-expath@w3.org>
Message-ID: <51D48D20.6010004@kosek.cz>

On 3.7.2013 22:41, Michael Kay wrote:

>>> I thought that we can formally use untypedAtomic in signature, but raise
>>> dynamic error when passed parameter is not hexBinary or base64Binary
>>> value.
>>
>> This would also be my favorite approach (as I believe I have mentioned
>> in the thread from March).
>>
> 
> I'm sure you mean xs:anyAtomicType rather than xs:untypedAtomic.

Indeed, sorry for confusion.

   Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bringing you XML Prague conference    http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 20:44:42 UTC