W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-expath@w3.org > August 2013

Re: EXPath binary module - comments - bin:subsequence()

From: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 13:01:37 +0200
Message-ID: <CAP94bnMhFYHL8jZh-r8FzP_t++zEH5dsOMzi87Xn7bJDU5BZEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Lumley <john@saxonica.com>
Cc: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>, Adam Retter <adam@exist-db.org>, EXPath <public-expath@w3.org>
...sounds feine!
Am 06.08.2013 12:38 schrieb "John Lumley" <john@saxonica.com>:

>  On 05/08/2013 10:02, Adam Retter wrote:
>
>  What about bin:subpart() ?
>
>
> I think just bin:part() would be enough
>
>  Sounds pretty good to me - simple, doesn't conflict with anything else as
> far as I can see. Can anyone see some other meaning or possible conflict
> that we've overlooked?
>
> --
> *John Lumley* MA PhD CEng FIEE
> john@saxonica.com
> on behalf of Saxonica Ltd
>
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 11:02:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:52:20 UTC