W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-expath@w3.org > August 2013

Re: EXPath binary module - comments - endianness

From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:43:17 +0100
Cc: EXPath CG <public-expath@w3.org>, Adam Retter <adam@exist-db.org>, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Message-Id: <2AD7ECA5-22D6-4F8D-A89D-2F38E336BFE8@saxonica.com>
To: John Lumley <john@saxonica.com>
>> Perhaps if I am mistaken, and there are more than two octet orders,
>> then using a string would be fine. 
Well, there is "middle-endian" (see http://unixpapa.com/incnote/byteorder.html) though I think it's unlikely anyone would want to support it nowadays.

> But there is another issue we haven't addressed - the default being 'little endian'. Whilst I understand that the common x86 architecture is little-endian, I'm more concerned that I very rarely (perhaps never?) see little-endian data in my own limited practice - mostly its been big-endian. 

Agreed, I think most-significant-first is by far the most common in interchange standards; though of course that falls into the 93% of all statistics which are made up on the spur of the moment...

Michael Kay
Received on Monday, 5 August 2013 10:43:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:52:20 UTC