W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-expath@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Table of EXPath Modules implemented or about to be implemented

From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:38:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAK2GfECwbVyonrroojpZWMpGLtvTHMgS2ya1GwCZ_ZHKX-8dA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Cc: public-expath@w3.org
Heum... I want to be sure we're all on the same line here

This community group is for implementers as well as users (like me)

If you tell me that you're supporting a version of a SPEC (defined by its
datetime), I would like to know if the version I'm currently using is
already supporting it

So if you tell me that you're supporting version 2010-05-17 of a EXPath
Thermodynamic Specification, I would like to know since which version OF
YOUR PRODUCT you're supporting the 2010-05-17 version of this specification

I clearly don't care to know that in previous version of your product you
were supporting 2009-03-21 edition of the spec. Anyway, if I sufficiently
care, I'm going to ask it on your mailing list...

My two cents


On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>wrote:

> On 10 May 2012 09:45, Innovimax W3C wrote:
>  Hi,
> > We should probably point 2 versions
> > * The last edition of the spec that has been implemented
> > * The first version of the product that has implemented this last edition
>   I've updated eXist, Saxon, Calabash and Servlex accordingly.  I
> think it is not really clear though, in the table, and I'm not sure
> the "first product version" is really relevant info, should we keep
> it?
>  Regards,
> --
> Florent Georges
> http://fgeorges.org/
> http://h2oconsulting.be/

Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 14:38:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 10 May 2012 14:38:57 GMT