W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-expath@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Table of EXPath Modules implemented or about to be implemented

From: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:02:12 +0200
Message-ID: <CAP94bnO3iUg=sume=pPB4AhiHFH5x8BYZOxxh_JncaaTqnJLHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Cc: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>, public-expath@w3.org
>> We should probably point 2 versions
>> * The last edition of the spec that has been implemented
>> * The first version of the product that has implemented this last edition
>
>  I've updated eXist, Saxon, Calabash and Servlex accordingly.  I
> think it is not really clear though, in the table, and I'm not sure
> the "first product version" is really relevant info, should we keep
> it?

True! I also wonder if we really need the product version in this
table. To be honest, it would take me some time to find out the first
version of BaseX that included each spec. (most of our users are
working with more recent versions anyway).

By the way, I have noticed that the EXPath Crypto module is not
available online anymore. Has it been removed from the list the
official specifications?

Christian
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 14:03:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 10 May 2012 14:03:19 GMT