- From: Takuki Kamiya <tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 16:48:21 -0700
- To: "public-exi@w3.org" <public-exi@w3.org>
Hi, I took a look at Youenn's comments [1] on Canonical EXI FPWD draft. With regards to section 4.4 Stream Order, YF wrote: > The note about insignificant xsi:type may also be illustrated with > xsi:type=xsd:anyType profile case. I would recommend to add xsi:type="xsd:anyType" as an example. With regards to section 4.5.6 String and String Table, YF wrote: > a bit fuzzy. Maybe it should be added that the convention must be agreed > by both parties or even stronger requirements (must be able to express the > convention within EXI options for instance?). In section 4.5.6, there is a description: "Unless the convention used by the application dictates differently (e.g., EXI Profile parameter localValuePartitions set to "0")," I suggest to modify it as follows. "Unless a convention was indicated in Canonical EXI Options (with link to section 2.1) by an application to dictate differently (e.g., EXI Profile parameter localValuePartitions set to "0")," Thank you, [1] https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/exi/issues/95 Takuki Kamiya Fujitsu Laboratories of America
Received on Monday, 8 August 2016 23:49:01 UTC