W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-exi@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Proposal for including EXI in XMPP

From: Joachim Lindborg <joachim.lindborg@sust.se>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:29:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGA60Mrp8wb0NNLdRu7FhTk6fqU=2CmzwXvC+xpKf3dFYx6bzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Cc: John Schneider <john.schneider@agiledelta.com>, Peter Waher <Peter.Waher@clayster.com>, FABLET Youenn <Youenn.Fablet@crf.canon.fr>, "public-exi@w3.org" <public-exi@w3.org>, Yusuke DOI <yusuke.doi@toshiba.co.jp>, XMPP Standards <standards@xmpp.org>, "mact-usa@att.net" <mact-usa@att.net>, Stephen Williams <sdw@lig.net>
We are in our projects using www.contiki-os.org/ created by www.sics.se and
constrained nodes and the aim is to use EXI and XMPP over IPv6 according to
the new XEP's with Sensor Networks.

/Joachim

2013/3/15 Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 3/14/13 6:50 PM, John Schneider wrote:
> > Peter,
> >
> > Its really great to see some momentum on this! Thanks very much for
> > the energy you are putting into it. This is something in which I've
> > had a long-running interest. In fact, I think Peter and I first
> > talked about it back in 2005 (yikes!). Although I'm not sure Peter
> > was completely sold on the idea at the time (broccoli ice cream
> > anyone? [1]), he was gracious enough to help us get the XMPP EXI
> > use case together [2] and even started an early draft [3]. Thanks
> > Peter! ;-)
>
> One must keep an open mind.
>
> > Here at work, we have incorporated EXI into various XMPP solutions
> > to support our Efficient XML users (e.g., to enable XMPP on
> > aircraft). So, I'm very interested in following your progress.
> > Please keep me in the loop as you move forward. I'd be very happy
> > to help if I can.
>
> Yesterday at IETF 86 I had a productive chat with Yusuke Doi on this
> topic. He helped me see that, just as we've defined HTTP bindings
> (BOSH / WebSocket) for web endpoints like browsers, an EXI binding
> would expand the universe of XMPP usage to constrained devices of the
> kind that might otherwise use protocols like CoAP.
>
> Although I've not yet had time to read the new EXI proposal in detail,
> I shall do so as soon as possible and provide comments on the
> standards@xmpp.org list.
>
> Peter
>
> - --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRQvpOAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pcfMQAKPeGWf+02AZmrGff3hA+H+I
> g9INO8/62pukrj7utK1BuBRkersMXLxJUm3TIWnfQuqBXe/zgbkcvms42GHvu9+R
> J5/37i4Mq+lKHdI/XyPtLnn6/3YjriotGwl2ZKpvxvD4b66F0BL0jUaCoZx6jpPm
> N7QNYtX51uzpU7ofWfWf/IhzXOKNgFaB4u/EVcJp4+Gu8UInnualtkeq/ZHQwEiG
> SkpE36LfuCy31cXEd4Oankv30ywOwUmh2ETwzLyeDPzPfhFVdjgNkabnJr1J/H/n
> 8GnZNIEgzx/hFTGUetHkhMaHQfqGAVtEjWsFIYStugQnBRS6pP/V+fEME4DEMw64
> FLf9sF8sJBSP4/e62Z8myog/eVWrYiGNjGRu8qvo+fNmD4Fn+/qhHA/SvYcN+ZXN
> yqeqzAJty+A+oxduPCN+bbP93grroSjs1qmN7ybsu+bO9hJiDCs3IIsJPOBZrr9Y
> uQ+an33QWIAEsPRO4VKQlFYxHmh6QRjUPTCeFyFemuD7dyLk3UBXNikMUrvcFwBa
> uj0jAyC0tIf0w/Qm5RPtzVIV02On1jKRjHGoNLjEnjf0nusmdqzEZMq3mIL95PzL
> g1WYu5ASmDVAzWUuwvhYYMGraAQbqrnj5+QgiaAEHulpjl43ut7FHYslD7uyPvFp
> E8efql+LqrpSRCjgvZ8e
> =jNUK
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 
Regards

Joachim Lindborg
CTO, systems architect

Sustainable Innovation AB
Adress: Box 55998 102 16 Stockholm
Besöksadress: Storgatan 31 (Malmgården)
Email: Joachim.lindborg@sust.se, www.sust.se
Tel +46 706-442270
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 09:33:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:52:44 UTC