W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-exi-comments@w3.org > October 2008

RE: [EXI] Undeclared production for Ur-Type and Element Fragment Grammar

From: Daniel Peintner <daniel.peintner@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 18:57:44 +0200
Message-ID: <abbf52e10810020957l1939d126lcc72a964e7b93f6c@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Yuri Delendik" <yury_exi@yahoo.com>, public-exi-comments@w3.org, "Efficient XML Interchange WG" <member-exi-wg@w3.org>

Hi Yuri,

Thank you very much for your feedback.

> Complex Ur-type Grammar (8.5.4.1.3.3) and Schema-informed Element Fragment Grammar
> (Section 8.5.3) section define element grammars, but do not define grammars for corresponding
> TypeEmpty_i. Section 8.5.4.4 Undeclared Element uses the empty grammars in explanation
> how the xsi:nil form is evaluated.
>
> It is unclear how the xsl:nil form is evaluated when TypeEmpty_i grammar is not present.

You are right. That's an omission in the specification which will be
fixed with the next update.

e.g. TypeEmpty for ur-Type is going to look like

Ur-Type_0 :
  AT(*)  Ur-Type_0
  EE

Regards,

-- Daniel
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 16:59:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:45:27 UTC