Re: XHTML Basic: Useful? Implemented?

Quoting Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>:
> If I understood the question correctly. He meant if the semantics  
> contained in XHTML Basic for its purpose, is it possible for him to  
> use it? Would it cause problems in some implementations?

Basic is a subset of XHTML Mod. Implementations do things based on
namespace-dispatching (ignoring DOCTYPE nonsense) so if it is a problem it
would probably mean the respective implementation has a bug in its
implementation of XHTML Mod or XHTML Mod has a bug. (With image maps, for
example... Pointing to a <map> element should be done using an URI, not
IDREF...)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>