W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-evangelist@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Valid XML

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 23:53:24 +0200
To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
Cc: <public-evangelist@w3.org>
Message-ID: <42ae5b87.118685328@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Jim Ley wrote:
>No, the start of the thread, which Bjoern joined was about XML conformance, 
>and how Bloglines didn't follow XML conformance ruels.  If you recall it was 
>about a problem with an RSS XML document with broken encoding from 
>http://www.webstandards.org/buzz/buzz.xml [1] which was parsed normally by 
>Bloglines (albeit with wrongly interpreted characters) I was asking for help 
>in how to ask Bloglines to obey the XML guidelines.  Bjoern was just asking 
>for similar help with XHTML guidelines.

Actually, my comment was concerned with XML well-formedness aswell, the
apparent site maintainer said that "last thing [he] want[s] to do is
start fixing" these problems and I like you I am still wondering what an
appropriate response would be. It's unfortunate this turned into a more
general XHTML discussion.
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 21:52:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:19 UTC