- From: Stephanie Troeth <steph@unadorned.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:11:57 -0400
- To: "'public-evangelist@w3.org'" <public-evangelist@w3.org>
Karl Dubost wrote: > Yes it's one of the issues of HTML/XHTML which has different implications: > > * The semantic of XHTML/HTML is not defined as a conformance requirement. > Related: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2004Oct/0008 > It's a very difficult topic that I could explain a little bit more > if people need it. > * How do we explain Semantics of HTML/XHTML? > * Do we need a best practices guide? > * Should this best practices guide be part of an XHTML Specification? or > a separate document? or part of a collective effort for example done > here on this mailing-list? Seconding John Colby, yes to all the above. Shirley Kaiser has a good article on the subject of HTML, XHTML semantics and structure: http://www.brainstormsandraves.com/articles/semantics/structure/ I think a collective effort would be useful, though lengthy. Perhaps a good way to begin is for a small leading subgroup of 3 or 4 people to take a lead on it and present something back to this list for input/discussion? cheers, -steph
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2004 12:11:20 UTC