W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-evangelist@w3.org > October 2004

Re: web standards project article

From: Stephanie Troeth <steph@unadorned.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:11:57 -0400
Message-ID: <4180E20D.9010704@unadorned.org>
To: "'public-evangelist@w3.org'" <public-evangelist@w3.org>

Karl Dubost wrote:

> Yes it's one of the issues of HTML/XHTML which has different implications:
> 
> * The semantic of XHTML/HTML is not defined as a conformance requirement.
>     Related: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2004Oct/0008
>     It's a very difficult topic that I could explain a little bit more 
> if people need it.
> * How do we explain Semantics of HTML/XHTML?
> * Do we need a best practices guide?
> * Should this best practices guide be part of an XHTML Specification? or 
> a separate document? or part of a collective effort for example done 
> here on this mailing-list?

Seconding John Colby, yes to all the above.

Shirley Kaiser has a good article on the subject of HTML, XHTML 
semantics and structure:
http://www.brainstormsandraves.com/articles/semantics/structure/

I think a collective effort would be useful, though lengthy. Perhaps a 
good way to begin is for a small leading subgroup of 3 or 4 people to 
take a lead on it and present something back to this list for 
input/discussion?

cheers,
-steph
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2004 12:11:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 30 October 2009 16:36:53 GMT