W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-evangelist@w3.org > February 2004

[Fwd: Fw: WaSP: Disappointing Alternative Description]

From: steph <steph@unadorned.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:36:11 -0500
Message-ID: <4033866B.2020204@unadorned.org>
To: public-evangelist@w3.org

Hi Olivier, Karl and Dom,

Please see below ... can we please come up with a suitable longdesc for the graph in the recently published "WaSP asks W3C" (WaW)?



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fw: WaSP: Disappointing Alternative Description
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:15:09 -0600
From: Dave Shea <dave@mezzoblue.com>
To: nigel@miswebdesign.com
CC: learn@webstandards.org

Hey Nigel,

The alt text is exactly what alt text should be, as far as I'm concerned
- simple and to the point. But a longdesc or even title would be
beneficial in this case, since there's so much extra data that's
locked-up in the image.

Any suggestions on how we'd go about summarizing a multi-tiered graph as


------------- Forwarded message follows -------------

Hi Dave,

In the following recent WaSP article:

The alternative description for the image 'graph of ccpp' is
disappointing, surely there should be a longdesc?

Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2004 10:36:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:18 UTC