- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:28:38 -0500
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org
- Cc: f8dy@diveintomark.org
I think that some people will talk about it here.
So I think you have already read this entry of Mark Pilgrim.
http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/01/13.html#semantic_obsolescence
about http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xhtml2-20021211/
and http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xhtml2-20021211/mod-text.html#s_textmodule
I remind people that:
1. XHTML 2.0 is still a WD
2. You send comments about this XHTML version to the mailing
list. Specs are also made by the public... if this public send
comments to the mailing list. The process of W3C has to reply to all
comments sent on the mailing list when they address specific issues.
"Public discussion of XHTML takes place on
www-html@w3.org (archive). To subscribe send
an email to www-html-request@w3.org with the
word subscribe in the subject line.
Please report errors in this document to
www-html-editor@w3.org (archive)."
I hope that Mark Pilgrim will send his comments to the www-html
mailing list too.
Thanks.
--
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
http://www.w3.org/QA/
--- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Monday, 13 January 2003 16:29:02 UTC