- From: James Ross <J.G.Ross@warwick.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 18:19:53 +0000
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org
David S wrote: > On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 05:31 AM, Robert Clary wrote: > >> You gain no real benefit from using XHTML content if the page is to >> be served as text/html. > > If nothing else, the syntax rules are more consistent and simply make > more sense than HTML4. Don't you think? I know it has been much easier > to teach strict XHTML than strict HTML4. Actually, in my opinion HTML (event Strict HTML4) is much simpler and easier to use than XHTML. -- James Ross <J.G.Ross@warwick.ac.uk> Webmaster, The University of Warwick Computing Society http://www.warwickcompsoc.co.uk/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Received on Friday, 6 December 2002 13:20:12 UTC