W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw@w3.org > August 2004

Re: SKOS meets Semantic blogging (again)?

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:46:18 -0400
To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
Cc: 'Morten Frederiksen' <mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk>, public-esw@w3.org, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, dino@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040816154618.GL19205@homer.w3.org>

* Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> [2004-08-16 11:45-0400]
> 
> * Miles, AJ (Alistair)  <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> [2004-08-16 14:15+0100]
> > 
> > Nice work :)
> > 
> > Re SKOS Mapping, have you got any suggestions for changes or new features?
> > 
> > SKOS Core is getting all the attention right now, but I'm happy to do
> > changes to SKOS Mapping too if they get consensus on the list.
> 
> Proposal:
> 
> (dropping the 'has-' idiom in the label, though just my taste...)
> 
> <rdf:Property rdf:ID="approximate Match">

oops, meant to type "approximateMatch".

>   <rdfs:label>appropximate match</rdfs:label>
>   <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="#mappingRelation"/>
>   <rdfs:comment>If concept A has (an) 'approximinate match' to some 
> concept B then typically a majority of resources that have concept 
> A as a (dc:)subject will also have concept B as their (dc:)subject, and 
> vice-versa. This relationship indicates a general, if ill-defined, 
> strong similarity between two SKOS concepts.</rdfs:comment>
> </rdf:Property>
> 
> I have a use case for this, in mapping between the SKOS concepts in
> my personal weblog with those from others I contribute to, eg. SWAD-E
> and FOAF.
> 
> (BTW I checked the behaviour of Wordpress w.r.t. deleting categories; it
> seems to take care _not_ to re-assign its numeric identifiers to 
> subsequently created new categories).
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Dan
Received on Monday, 16 August 2004 15:46:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:13 GMT