W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Other languages

From: Matthews, BM (Brian) <B.M.Matthews@rl.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:08:23 +0100
Message-ID: <350DC7048372D31197F200902773DF4C02501B12@exchange11.rl.ac.uk>
To: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@w3.org>, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Cc: public-esw@w3.org


By "tried this" I meant of course carried out translations
for key RDF/SW recs.  Case of not carrying the context from
brain to finger (how swebby :-)

B


>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Matthews, BM (Brian) [mailto:B.M.Matthews@rl.ac.uk]
>  Sent: 09 September 2002 11:57
>  To: 'Dan Brickley'; Charles McCathieNevile
>  Cc: public-esw@w3.org
>  Subject: RE: Other languages
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  Translations of key specs is something that the W3C Offices
>  (apart from UK and Australia at least!) do a lot of.  I could
>  ask around to see whether offices have tried this - and they
>  could be a source of translators. 
>  
>  Brian 
>  
>  >  -----Original Message-----
>  >  From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@w3.org]
>  >  Sent: 07 September 2002 19:50
>  >  To: Charles McCathieNevile
>  >  Cc: public-esw@w3.org
>  >  Subject: Re: Other languages
>  >  
>  >  
>  >  
>  >  
>  >  Cool. Reminds me that 
>  >  http://www.w3.org/RDF/translations.html includes
>  >  an Italian translation of the old Model and Syntax spec.
>  >  
>  >  I wonder if as part of outreach efforts we could look into 
>  >  finding folk to
>  >  update (or create) translations of key RDF/SW specs (and 
>  >  other docs?).
>  >  I could bring this up in the Semantic Web Coordination 
>  >  Group, since it'd
>  >  need to fit with RDFCore and WebOnt WG's schedules. I'm 
>  not sure what
>  >  point in the spec lifecycle is best for encouraging 
>  >  tranlations... need to
>  >  look into precedents, policy etc first.
>  >  
>  >  Anyway 
>  >  http://www.xml.it:23456/RDF/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222-it.html is the
>  >  Italian version of M+S...
>  >  
>  >  Dan
>  >  
>  >  ps. re stable url for logs, I hope to have esw.w3.org soon 
>  >  for a public
>  >  Wiki, we could use that namespace for IRC logs too. I prefer 
>  >  not to have
>  >  publically writeable stuff at http://www.w3.org/* URIs, to avoid
>  >  confusion...
>  >  
>  >  On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>  >  
>  >  >
>  >  > Hi folks,
>  >  >
>  >  > We have recently set up an IRC channel as a parallel to 
>  >  #rdfig which is in
>  >  > Italian. I am not sure how many people reading this list 
>  >  speak Italian, but
>  >  > the idea is that there are people who do, and who were 
>  >  struggling with RDFIG
>  >  > in english. If this experiment (and it is still very much 
>  >  that) works, we may
>  >  > try to repeat it for other languages.
>  >  >
>  >  > Some links:
>  >  > The thing was "chumped" in RDFIG on 5 September:
>  >  > http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2002/09/05/2002-09-05.html
>  >  >
>  >  > There are two days of logs (quiet, and the logs are 
>  >  hand-edited so badly
>  >  > formated): http://www.w3.org/People/Charles/rdfit/20020905a and
>  >  > http://www.w3.org/People/Charles/rdfit/20020906 (my hope 
>  >  is to have a
>  >  > regularl logging bot on this channel and keep the logs in 
>  >  a predictable
>  >  > and stable place.)
>  >  >
>  >  > Cheers
>  >  >
>  >  > Chaals
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  
>  
Received on Monday, 9 September 2002 07:08:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:11 GMT