Re: SKOS transitive hierarchical relations

Hi Antoine,

> Great! And sorry for not having spotted that in the UMBEL stuff. It's 
> good that there's a community that looks at such things :-)

Don't be sorry; this has been created 4 years ago, and re-visiting its 
premises and structure is always needed; that is what evolution is about 
no? :)

So, let's stick to this convention. In any case, it won't impact umbel, 
and it should makes more sense to reasoners that follows that convention.

Thanks!

Take care,

Fred

Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2012 19:20:54 UTC