W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > March 2011

Re: best practice property to use for naming a skos:ConceptScheme

From: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:26:14 +0100
Message-ID: <4D7AA186.8030103@koeln.de>
To: Bob DuCharme <bob@snee.com>
CC: SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi,

Doesn't answer your question, but:
The DC terms namespace contains all the elements properties, so http://purl.org/dc/terms/title exists:
http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-title

Regards,
  Simon

Bob DuCharme wrote:
>   Yesterday I was discussing with a colleague whether rdfs:label or 
> skos:prefLabel would be better, and today I noticed this at 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-skos-reference-20090818/#L1045 :
> 
> <S> rdf:type skos:ConceptScheme ;
>   dct:title "My First Thesaurus" ;
>   skos:hasTopConcept <B> .
> 
> dct: is never declared anywhere. I'm guessing from the t that 
> http://purl.org/dc/terms/ was meant, but title is a property of 
> http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ , not of http://purl.org/dc/terms/ . 
> Either way, it's confusing and another example of why people should 
> always declare their prefixes, if only in a note at the beginning of a 
> spec that uses them in examples.
> 
> But enough of my complaining. Has anyone seen a common practice using a 
> particular property to assign a human-readable label to a 
> skos:ConceptScheme?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Bob
> 
Received on Friday, 11 March 2011 22:27:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 11 March 2011 22:27:19 GMT