W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > May 2010

Question about label and comments

From: Tao, Cui, Ph.D. <Tao.Cui@mayo.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:53:33 -0500
Message-ID: <4B6B513FBE052B479C7E3F0D7577753FB146F7@MSGEBE35.mfad.mfroot.org>
To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi, everyone,

I wonder if there is any rule about using skos:note and rdfs:comment?
For anything that is general enough (e.g, not example, or definition, or
changeNote, etc), is there any restriction or drawback to use

I think rdfs:label falls into the same situation. If there is only one
label available for a class, should one use rdfs:label or

In addition,SKOS has changeNote and historyNote. We are not very clear
about the difference between them. For example, if I want to stay that I
added definitions to this ontology, should that be a changeNote, a
historyNote, or even an editorialNote?

We would really appreciate it if someone can give us some clarification
on these confusions.


Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 14:55:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:32:13 UTC