- From: Alistair Miles <alimanfoo@googlemail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:14:13 +0100
- To: Christophe Dupriez <christophe.dupriez@destin.be>
- Cc: SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi Christophe, thanks for feeding this back, I'm sure others will find this useful, especially Diane. Cheers Alistair On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 05:43:06PM +0200, Christophe Dupriez wrote: > Hi Alistair, > > With the Belgium Poison Centre, we settled for your suggestion. > Adding icons and a "logical" order, we get this: > http://www.askosi.org/image/status/ > > We added a french and a dutch translation of the terms. > The modified SKOS RDF is available: > http://www.askosi.org/example/RegStatus.xml > (you have to "View Source" to see the SKOS RDF under the XSLT style sheet) > > I wrote to Diane Hillmann, the NSDL maintainer of this scheme. > > Many thanks for this suggestion! > > Christophe > > Le 29/04/2010 13:55, Alistair Miles a écrit : > >FWIW, I know jon phipps created a status vocabulary which is used > >internally in metadataregistry.org, see: > > > >http://metadataregistry.org/concept/list/vocabulary_id/31.html > > > >Maybe not what you're after, but I thought I'd make the connection. > > > >Cheers, > > > >Alistair > > > >On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 08:47:45PM +0200, Dan Brickley wrote: > >>+cc: Leigh, Libby > >> > >>On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Bernard Vatant > >><bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>wrote: > >> > >>>Hello folks > >>> > >>>We are currently revisiting the Geonames ontology (long overdue) including > >>>feature codes, on which I would like to add some Dublin-Core like > >>>annotations re. concepts. In particular some concepts are going to be > >>>deprecated using dcterms:isReplacedBy, some will be deprecated altogether > >>>without replace because they've never be used, and quite a lot will be put > >>>in a status of quasi-obsolescence or quasi-extinction. Those are feature > >>>codes used less than one per million features, which means less than 7 times > >>>considering Geonames has over 7 millions features in store ... > >>>I was wondering which vocabulary is the best for expressing that. > >>>http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/ns is used by FOAF, Bibontology > >>>and others. But it defines status as a data property, I would prefer an > >>>object property with an enumerated range of individual values. Of course I > >>>can define those in geonames data space, but since this is not particular to > >>>geographical codes, I was wondering if there was some vocabulary on some > >>>shelves I miss. BTW I was amazed not to find any "status" property in Dublin > >>>Core. > >>> > >>Yes, that is a limitation of the sw-vocab-status vocab. At the end of last > >>year I started writing it up towards a W3C Note (after a 'go for it' from > >>Ivan), with Libby Miller and Leigh Dodds. The effort is a little stalled but > >>the draft is at http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/note.html > >> > >>If you think it's worthwhile, we could expand the note to include new more > >>useful properties. > >> > >>Interested to help? :) > >> > >>(even encouraging us to put time into this counts as help!) > >> > >>Dan > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>Suggestions? > >>> > >>>-- > >>>Bernard Vatant > >>>Senior Consultant > >>>Vocabulary& Data Engineering > >>>Tel: +33 (0) 971 488 459 > >>>Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com > >>>---------------------------------------------------- > >>>Mondeca > >>>3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France > >>>Web: http://www.mondeca.com > >>>Blog: http://mondeca.wordpress.com > >>>---------------------------------------------------- > >>> > -- Alistair Miles Head of Epidemiological Informatics Centre for Genomics and Global Health <http://cggh.org> The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics Roosevelt Drive Oxford OX3 7BN United Kingdom Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman Email: alimanfoo@gmail.com Tel: +44 (0)1865 287669
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 08:15:04 UTC