Dear Peter, Unfortunately there is now new progress yet, at least as far as our work is concerned. By the way, I would like to remind to the list that our thoughts concerning SKOS and OWL2 are analyzed in [1] (and a more general work about expressing thesauri in SKOS in [2]) and we are looking forward for feedback by all those members that share same concerns on SKOS and OWL/OWL2. In [1] we also reference other discussions related to the subject. Of course, as soon as will have something new, we will update our wiki page and we will announce it to the list. Kind Regards, Georgia [1] http://swig.hpclab.ceid.upatras.gr/SKOS/Skos2Owl2 [2] http://swig.hpclab.ceid.upatras.gr/SKOS -----Original Message----- From: Peter Bruhn Andersen [mailto:bruhn.andersen@webspeed.dk] Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 3:54 PM To: Georgia Solomou Cc: 'Antoine Isaac'; public-esw-thes@w3.org; Peter F. Patel-Schneider; Dimitrios Koutsomitropoulos Subject: Re: SKOS and OWL2 Any new development regarding SKOS using OWL 2 ? Is the SKOS WG working on this currently? Regards, Peter -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Received on Monday, 1 February 2010 13:57:50 UTC