- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:01:50 +0100
- To: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: Dan Morrison <themelonman@gmail.com>, SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, Leo Sauermann <leo.sauermann@dfki.de>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Sean Bechhofer a écrit : > > On 23 Nov 2009, at 21:51, Dan Morrison wrote: > >> In the -dev branch of import-export anyway :-B >> I should put together a little screencast. >> >> As it's so esoteric, it may not be for human consumption - I mean it >> took me over a year to find the first (only) example of SKOS in the >> wild that represented a taxonomy that was suitable for import! >> So it's not something I've been crowing about, it's just another thing >> that MAY be useful to someone somewhere down the track. >> >> If anyone can link to a SKOS file that represents a glossary, >> taxonomy, or restricted vocabulary in any useful field, I can point >> the machine at it and see what happens. So far results have been >> surprisingly good, but I'm sure that some tuning may be needed if I >> feed it enough astual data. >> >> ..dan. > > > The SKOS implementation report [1] cited a number of vocabularies that > were using SKOS. How about one of those? > > Cheers, > > Sean > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/implementation.html Yes, Dan, if you want to play with something, maybe one of the IVOA astronomy vocabularies can be nice. Especially because there are a couple of "small" vocs with a clear hierarchical structure there, such as [2]. And then you could have a try with bigger vocabularies. But be careful, things such as subject heading lists (like LCSH at [3]) are more like "networks" of concepts that are not really intended at for global hierarchical browsing, as they maybe have some thousands of "top" nodes... Cheers, Antoine [2] http://www.ivoa.net/rdf/Vocabularies/vocabularies-20091007/AVM/ [3] http://id.loc.gov
Received on Tuesday, 24 November 2009 10:02:20 UTC