Best practices: SKOS-XL or SKOS Core from LAABOUDI Christine (OPOCE) on 2009-11-18 (public-esw-thes@w3.org from November 2009)

From: LAABOUDI Christine (OPOCE) <Christine.LAABOUDI@publications.europa.eu>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:48:04 +0100
To: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
CC: "CHAILLOUX Cedric (OPOCE)" <Cedric.CHAILLOUX@publications.europa.eu>, "KUSTER Marc (OPOCE)" <Marc.KUSTER@publications.europa.eu>
Message-ID: <3DDF287233F96A478B0B6B207711614E015E194930DF@OPMERSEM701.publications.win>

Dear all,

In Eurovoc RDF, preferred terms are represented in SKOS-XL rather than in SKOS core?
What are the pro/cons of this representation?

Example of a preferred terms + qualifier:

        <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://eurovoc.europa.eu/383173 ">
         <xl:literalForm xml:lang="sl">Butan (Kraljevina)</xl:literalForm>
        </rdf:Description>

        <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://eurovoc.europa.eu/381993 ">
         <xl:literalForm xml:lang="sl">butan (plin)</xl:literalForm>
        </rdf:Description>

Regards,

Christine LAABOUDI-SPOIDEN
Publications Office
EUR-Lex Unit
Eurovoc Team

Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 17:30:28 UTC