Antoine, Thanks for the clarification. Best regards Stephane Fellah On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Antoine Isaac <Antoine.Isaac@kb.nl> wrote: > Dear Stephane, > > Indeed, there is nothing in the specs that forbids you to do this (see all > formal semantic axioms at [1]). Which means that you can do it :-) > > I can understand your feeling puzzled here. But SKOS, as many Semantic Web > ontologies, allows for many things. It is therefore much more economical to > specify what is not allowed, rather than listing everything that is allowed. > We'll say, for instance, that a concept can have only one prefLabel per > language tag, but we won't say that a concept can have any number of > narrower concepts. It's just implicit... > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference > > > -------- Message d'origine-------- > De: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org de la part de Stephane Fellah > Date: ven. 19/06/2009 18:59 > À: public-esw-thes@w3.org > Objet : Consistency of skos:note properties > > > Hi, > > I am implementing a SKOS API based on the candidate recommendation. > > > I like to know if the following cases are consistent in the SKOS > specification. > > Case 1: <MyConcept> skos:note "my generic note"@en skos:note "My second > note"@en > Case 2: <MyConcept> skos:note "my generic note"@en ; skos:scopeNote "my > scope note"@en > > Is it required to have only one note per language ? > > There is nothing said in the spec about this. Would be nice to have a > clarification. > > Best regards > -- > Stephane Fellah, MS, B.Sc > > Lead Software Engineer > >Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 17:34:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:32:47 GMT