W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > January 2009

RE: substitute for skos:isSubjectOf

From: Houghton,Andrew <houghtoa@oclc.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:27:31 -0500
Message-ID: <6548F17059905B48B2A6F28CE3692BAA02681A12@OAEXCH4SERVER.oa.oclc.org>
To: "Neubert Joachim" <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>, <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Yes, that’s what I meant.  dct:relation says that there is a relationship between the skos:Concept and another URI given by rdf:Description.  The dct:subject is a property of the URI given by rdf:Description.  One could have split this out to be:

 

<rdf:Description rdf:about=”http://www.econis.eu/...=Black+market”>

  <dct:subject rdf:resource=”http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4” />

</rdf:Description>

 

<skos:Concept rdf:about=”http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4”>

  <skos:prefLabel>Black market</skos:prefLabel>

  <dct:relation rdf:resource=”http://www.econis.eu/...=Black+market” />

</skos:Concept>

 

and if RDF encountered another definition some where in your data or any data you merged with, such as:

 

<rdf:Description rdf:about=”http://www.econis.eu/...=Black+market”>

  <dct:title>Black market search</dct:title>

</rdf:Description>

 

it would merge the dct:title and dct:subject under the http://www.econis.eu/...=Black+market URI.

 

 

Andy.

 

From: Neubert Joachim [mailto:J.Neubert@zbw.eu] 
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:13 PM
To: Houghton,Andrew; public-esw-thes@w3.org
Subject: AW: substitute for skos:isSubjectOf

 

So, the example you built would look like this:

 

 <skos:Concept rdf:about="http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4 <http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4> ">

    <skos:prefLabel>Black market</skos:prefLabel>

    <dct:relation>

      <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.econis.eu/...=Black+market <http://www.econis.eu/...=Black+market> ">

        <dct:subject rdf:resource="http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4" />

      </rdf:Description>

    </dct:relation>

  </skos:Concept>

 

Right, so far? The meaning, as I understand it, would be two statements about two different subjects:

 

http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4 has a dct:relation to http://www.econis.eu/...=Black+market, and

http://www.econis.eu/...=Black+market has a dct:subject of http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4

 

I'm not sure if I got this right -

 

Joachim

 

	
________________________________


	Von: Houghton,Andrew [mailto:houghtoa@oclc.org] 
	Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2009 17:14
	An: Neubert Joachim; public-esw-thes@w3.org
	Betreff: RE: substitute for skos:isSubjectOf

	Yup, I totally didn’t understand what you meant.   I thought http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4 was the bibliographic resource not the concept.  However given that new information it’s just a matter of switching the URI’s used in the example.  The rdf:about on the skos:Concept becomes http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4 and the rdf:about on the rdf:Description becomes the URI for the bibliographic resource and the rdf:resource on the dct:subject becomes http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4.  Sorry for the confusion.

	 

	Andy.

	 

	From: Neubert Joachim [mailto:J.Neubert@zbw.eu] 
	Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 11:04 AM
	To: Houghton,Andrew; public-esw-thes@w3.org
	Subject: AW: substitute for skos:isSubjectOf

	 

	Hi Andy, 

	 

	I'm not sure if I understood exactly what you mean. In my example, http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4 is the URI of the skos:Concept. I do not see how I could express an inverse relation to dc:subject by means of dcterms:relation. As rdfs:seeAlso, dcterms:relation in itself appears to me too general to serve as an substitute for skos:isSubjectOf.

	 

	Regards, Joachim

		 

		
________________________________


		Von: Houghton,Andrew [mailto:houghtoa@oclc.org] 
		Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2009 16:38
		An: Neubert Joachim; public-esw-thes@w3.org
		Betreff: RE: substitute for skos:isSubjectOf

		Right, I see a few mistakes in what I did, but assuming the URI for skos:Concept is http://www.econis.eu/concept/Black+market, then change the dct:subject to http://www.econis.eu/concept/Black+market.  Now I think it says that the resource at http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4 has the subject Black market.  Does that help?

		 

		Andy.

		 

		From: Neubert Joachim [mailto:J.Neubert@zbw.eu] 
		Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 10:34 AM
		To: Houghton,Andrew; public-esw-thes@w3.org
		Subject: AW: substitute for skos:isSubjectOf

		 

		Hi Andrew,

		 

		dcterms:subject is defined as "The topic of the resource", and I don't want to say: The result list of the search http://www.econis.eu/...=Black+market is the subject of the skos:Concept w/ prefLabel "Black+market".

		 

		Regards, Joachim

			 

			
________________________________


			Von: Houghton,Andrew [mailto:houghtoa@oclc.org] 
			Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2009 16:22
			An: public-esw-thes@w3.org
			Betreff: RE: substitute for skos:isSubjectOf

			Why couldn’t you do something like:

			 

			<?xml version="1.0"?>

			<rdf:RDF

			  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"

			  xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

			  xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos#"

			> 

			  <skos:Concept rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/">

			    <skos:prefLabel>Black market</skos:prefLabel>

			    <dct:relation>

			      <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4">

			        <dct:subject rdf:resource="http://www.econis/...=Black+market" />

			      </rdf:Description>

			    </dct:relation>

			  </skos:Concept>

			</rdf:RDF>

			  

			 

			 

			From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Neubert Joachim
			Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 9:57 AM
			To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
			Subject: substitute for skos:isSubjectOf

			 

			The SKOS Primer recommends using dc:subject for indexing purposes. For the inverse relation - this concept "is subject of" or "indexes" that resource - it gives no recommendation. The discussion about indexing properties in SKOS (commendably summarized in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/Indexing) also paid no attention to the now vanished skos:isSubjectOf. 

			 

			But it's definitively missing. My use case is this:

			 

			On the upcoming RDFa-enriched web pages for the Standard Thesaurus Economics (maintained by the German National Library of Economics, ZBW), we will include links to library resources. This links trigger a search for the concept at hand in the subject index of the library database - e.g. 

			http://www.econis.eu/DB=1/LNG=EN/CMD?ACT=SRCHM&IKT3=46&TRM3=Black+market searches for the concept http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4 with the prefLabel "Black market" and returns a result page with further links to books, articles and so on (not RDFa-enriched up to now, but this could change). To enhance the Web of Linked Data, I want to express this relationship in RDFa also. A triple

			 

			http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4 <http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4>  skos:isSubjectOf http://www.econis.eu/...=Black+market 

			 

			would have been perfect. (Of cause, the inverse relation can be expressed easily by dc:subject, but that puts the descriptor in the object position.)

			 

			I understand that the missing relation may be, strictly spoken, not part of the KOS (but an application of the KOS to resources) and therefore may be outside the scope of SKOS. But nevertheless a substitute is required. 

			 

			It would be easy to define some custom property, e.g. zbw:indexes, with skos:Concept as domain and rdf:resource as range. But since I feel that this may be a requirement not only by our site, there should be a more common, standardized way.

			 

			I did some research on this, but was out of luck:

			 

			- dc:subject lacks an inverseProperty

			- sioc:topic dito

			- dcterms:references/dcterms:isReferencedBy seems to be aimed at citations and alike

			- ore:describes/ore:isDescribedBy is too restricted in Domain/Range (ore:ResourceMap/ore:Aggregation)

			- rdfs:seeAlso is too general

			- frbr:isSubjectOf could be fine if domain and range are sufficiently general, but I couldn't figure out the status of this one (it is described as a skos:Concept in http://sandbox.metadataregistry.org/concept/show/id/923.html, but is not part of http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core or http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/extended)

			 

			I'm convinced that terminologies - expressed in SKOS - could perfectly serve as hubs in a Web of Linked Data. To this end, it would be highly beneficial to figure out and recommend a uniform way to link from skos:Concepts to arbitrary other resources. Can we do this?

			 

			Kind regards, Joachim

			 
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2009 17:28:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:32:11 UTC