W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > August 2009

Deadline extension - ISWC09 Workshop on Semantics for the rest of us - Aug 14th, 2009

From: Lalana Kagal <lkagal@csail.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:13:11 -0400
Message-Id: <DA407842-F980-4272-945B-739106B97F6C@csail.mit.edu>
To: semantic-web@w3.org, www-rdf-logic@w3.org, www-rdf-rules@w3.org, agents@cs.umbc.edu, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Cc: Lalana Kagal <lkagal@csail.mit.edu>, Tim Finin <finin@cs.umbc.edu>, ora.lassila@nokia.com

Apologies for cross-posting.

  *******  DEADLINE EXTENDED TO: August 14, 2009  *******

        Semantics for the Rest of Us: Variants of
     Semantic Web Languages in the Real World


           Workshop held in conjunction with the
    Eighth International Semantic Web Conference
               26 October 2009, Washington, DC

The Semantic Web is a broad vision of the future of personal computing,
emphasizing the use of sophisticated knowledge representation as the  
basis for
end-user applications' data modeling and management needs. Key to the
pervasive adoption of Semantic Web technologies is a good set of  
"building blocks" - the most important of these are representation  
themselves. W3C's standard languages for the Semantic Web, RDF and  
OWL, have
been around for several years. Instead of strict standards compliance,  
we see
"variants" of these languages emerge in applications, often tailored  
to a
particular application's needs. These variants are often either  
subsets of OWL
or supersets of RDF, typically with fragments OWL added. Extensions  
based on
rules, such as SWRL and N3 logic, have been developed as well as  
to the SPARQL query language and protocol.

This workshop will explore the landscape of RDF, OWL and SPARQL  
specifically from the standpoint of "real-world semantics". Are there
commonalities in these variants that might suggest new standards or new
versions of the existing standards?  We hope to identify common  
of applications consuming Semantic Web data and understand the pros  
and cons
of a strictly formal approach to modeling data versus a "scruffier"  
where semantics are based on application requirements and implementation

The workshop will encourage active audience participation and
discussion and will include a keynote by  Sandro Hawke (http://www.w3.org/People/Sandro/ 


We seek two kinds of submissions: full papers up to ten pages long and
position papers up to five pages long.  Format papers according the  
ISWC 2009
instructions. Accepted papers will be presented at the workshop and be  
part of
the workshop proceedings.  Submit via http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=semrusiswc09


Submission: 14 August 2009
Notification: 31 August 2009
Camera ready: 2 September 2009
Workshop: 26 October 2009


Lalana Kagal, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tim Finin, University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Ora Lassila, Nokia
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 17:13:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:32:12 UTC