- From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 15:53:09 +0100
- To: Alasdair J G Gray <agray@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
- Cc: SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Alisdair This issue was resolved at the recent F2F meeting in Washington. The relevant log of the discussion is here: http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#item04 The final resolution was: RESOLUTION: 1. keep the mapping vocabulary broadMatch, narrowMatch, 2. broadMatch, narrowMatch, etc. are rdfs:subPropertyOf broader, narrower, 3. there are no semantic conditions on broadMatch, narrowMatch; i.e. graphs 1-6 are all consistent, 4. there is some text about cultural conventions explaining where we expect broadMatch to be used, 5. by convention, mapping properties are only used to link concepts in different schemes, 6. in the Last Call WD we'll note that the mapping vocabulary may be dropped Hope that helps. Cheers, Sean -- Sean Bechhofer School of Computer Science University of Manchester sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Monday, 12 May 2008 14:53:40 UTC