W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > June 2008

Re: RE : aboutness and broader

From: Simon Spero <ses@unc.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:39:06 -0400
Message-ID: <1af06bde0806061039je1840f4s16506f3c041d2145@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jonathan Chetwynd" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
Cc: "Leonard Will" <L.Will@willpowerinfo.co.uk>, public-esw-thes@w3.org

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Jonathan Chetwynd <
j.chetwynd@btinternet.com> wrote:

> so many appear to be obsessed with defining concepts that are by general
> agreement elusive.
>
> is the hippopotamus in this room an animal?
> well it is, but we might be hard put to prove it....
>

No, but your *email* about a hippopotamus  is by definition also about
animals...

Received on Friday, 6 June 2008 17:39:42 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jonathan Chetwynd: "Gödel was: aboutness and broader"
Previous message: Leonard Will: "Re: RE : aboutness and broader"
In reply to: Jonathan Chetwynd: "Re: RE : aboutness and broader"
Next in thread: Jonathan Chetwynd: "Gödel was: aboutness and broader"
Reply: Jonathan Chetwynd: "Gödel was: aboutness and broader"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:32:28 GMT