RE: [SKOS] Transitive broader and ISSUE-56 (was The return of ISSUE-44 )

I do not think that creating the sub-properties 
skos:broaderTransitive and skos:narrowerTransitive makes SKOS too 
complex. I don't think we need much more hierarchy in the relations than that.

Daniel

At 09:34 AM 1/14/2008, Sini, Margherita (KCEW) wrote:
>I do not really like the solution of creating new sub-properties
>skos:broaderTransitive and skos:narrowerTransitive and make them transitive,
>because this means we may need to have many other cases, and this may go
>agains the "simplicity" we mention is good to keep in SKOS. But if any
>specification should be done, this is the correct way to go, I agree.

Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 02:44:48 UTC