- From: Quentin Reul <qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:13:24 +0100
- To: "Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- CC: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>, SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Hi Alistair, I personally prefer proposal 4 [1] as it implies the least amount of changes. I find the terms chosen as part of proposal 3 [2] to describe the new properties relatively confusing. As skos:prefLabel, etc. already cover both skos:Concept and labels, the introduction of skos:prefLabelR, skos:altLabelR and skos:hiddenLabelR would make it redundant. Is there plans to limit the range of skos:prefLabel, etc. to cover skos:Concept. Furthermore, there doesn't seem to have any differences between the semantic of skos:Concept and skos:Label. Cheers, Quentin [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBetweenLabels/ProposalFour [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBetweenLabels/ProposalThree Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: -- ****************************************** * Quentin H. Reul * * PhD Research Student * * Department of Computing Science * * University of Aberdeen, King's College * * Room 238 in the Meston Building * * ABERDEEN AB24 3UE * * Phone: +44 (0)1224 27 4485 * * http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~qreul * ******************************************
Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 12:13:59 UTC