On Dec 17, 2007 4:22 PM, Daniel Rubin <rubin@med.stanford.edu> wrote: > Sorry, but I disagree with the suggestion that people define > transitivity for themselves. SKOS should not leave such things > undefined--to do so guarantees people will have different semantics > for SKOS properties which will prevent interoperability. I appreciate this point Daniel. Can you provide a concrete example of how interoperability would be disrupted? //EdReceived on Monday, 17 December 2007 21:30:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:32:24 GMT