W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > December 2007

Re: [SKOS]: [ISSUE 44] BroaderNarrowerSemantics

From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:29:27 -0500
Message-ID: <f032cc060712171329y6d3b3a51g810324839da7efe4@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-swd-wg@w3.org, public-esw-thes@w3.org

On Dec 17, 2007 4:22 PM, Daniel Rubin <rubin@med.stanford.edu> wrote:
> Sorry, but I disagree with the suggestion that people define
> transitivity for themselves. SKOS should not leave such things
> undefined--to do so guarantees people will have different semantics
> for SKOS properties which will prevent interoperability.

I appreciate this point Daniel. Can you provide a concrete example of
how interoperability would be disrupted?

//Ed
Received on Monday, 17 December 2007 21:30:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:59 GMT