- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:49:06 +0100
- To: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Hi Mark >> But following up with this idea, and the other way round of Antoine's >> proposal, the concept scheme itself could integrate the declaration >> of its indexing rules, in the form of some equivalent for machines >> of skos:scopeNote, which conveys, if you look closely, some sort of >> indexing rule for humans. >> So something like skos:indexingRule, which could contain a formal ... > > I would prefer a format for rules that can be shared across ontologies > instead of a proposal that's specific to SKOS, but I don't know the > status of the Rule Interchange Format... [1] > What is specific to SKOS here - sharing Alistair's view on the scope of SKOS being indexing and search and retrieval of indexed resources - is the notion of indexing. On the format of rules I think SKOS should be agnostic, my proposal with skos:indexingRule is just to provide a black box wrapper saying "if you have specific indexing rules attached to this concept, put them here". This is open to any rule format, either in Semantic Web format or otherwise (even proprietary rules to be interpreted by whichever systems make sense of them). Bernard -- *Bernard Vatant *Knowledge Engineering ---------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca** *3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France Web: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com> ---------------------------------------------------- Tel: +33 (0) 871 488 459 Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> Blog: Leçons de Choses <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/>
Received on Monday, 13 November 2006 08:49:21 UTC