W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > December 2006

Re: SKOS & WordNet

From: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:37:22 +0100
Message-ID: <458966C2.9070208@cs.vu.nl>
To: Quentin Reul <qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk>
CC: public-esw-thes@w3.org

I didnt have a look at the actual RDF, but your question is not clear 
to me. Are you saying that there are very little skos:broader/narrower 
in the data at all?

Earlier mail from John and the statements on [1] seem to imply that 
hyponym/hypernym was not converted (into broader/narrower), and I 
agree that one would expect those to be present. Possibly this was not 
necessary for John's goals.

Mark.


[1]http://esw.w3.org/topic/SkosDev/DataZone

Quentin Reul wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was looking in details at the SKOS WordNet made available by John M. 
> Linebarger on 24/10/2006. As a result, I was wondering how the relations 
> (e.g. hypernyms) were represented in SKOS. I would have expected to have 
> found a few skos:broader & skos:narrower.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Quentin
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Quentin H. Reul
> Computing Science
> University of Aberdeen
> 
> 01224 272485
> qreul@csd.abdn.ac.uk
> http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~qreul <http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/%7Eqreul>
> <http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/%7Eqreul>
> 

-- 
  Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
        markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 16:37:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:55 GMT