Hi, > the past considered this inadequate and adopted an approach of > distinguishing matches at a finer level of detail (e.g. singular/plural > matches, spelling variations, etc., in addition to concept matches and exact [...] > 'exact match'. For example, to-the-letter exact matches or matches with > spelling variations or intervening characters, and so forth. This is not possible with SKOS in its current state, because there is no separate Term class. The terms are labels to which no further information such as mappings can be attached. See also [1,2]. Mark. [1]http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/proposals#thesaurusRepresentation-11 [2]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2006May/0009.html -- Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~markReceived on Wednesday, 16 August 2006 12:47:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:54 GMT