- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 22:47:27 +0200
- To: "Dragan Gasevic" <dgasevic@sfu.ca>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
On Wed, 11 May 2005 22:31:46 +0200, Dragan Gasevic <dgasevic@sfu.ca> wrote: > Thanks Charles! > > I have one more doubt - If I the concept A that has exactMatch with the > union of the classes B, C, and D. I wonder how I can define the oposit > relation, let say, between B and A (or C and A, or D and A). Maybe, I can > say they have majorMatch, or I have to define a mapping relation for each > pair? You could describe the exact match as being the union. I guess you could also say that B,C,D are strict subset (confusingly, I think that is like A is subClass of B, of C, and of D...) cheers -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundacion Sidar charles@sidar.org +61 409 134 136 http://www.sidar.org
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2005 20:47:41 UTC