- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:16:29 +0100
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: >Hi all, > >Just to note that I've been informed that most US federal guidance requires that only W3C RECs (and approved specs from OASIS, ISO, etc.) should be used in production systems. This obviously bears on the discussion of whether SKOS should become the basis for a REC track work item. > > Presumably, since SKOS-based RDF/XML docs comply with XML, RDF, Namespaces, RDFS/OWL, we're OK in that SKOs can be "used in production systems". Is the question more to do with whether SKOS itself can be named in calls for tender etc? Dan
Received on Monday, 27 June 2005 16:16:32 UTC