Re: SKOS Core review Re: issue: non-Literal "comment" properties Re: new draft of SKOS Core guide

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:40:36 -0000, Miles, AJ (Alistair)  
<A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> wrote:

> rdfs:comment does have to go as a super-prop for these props because of  
> its range, but I've been thinking that there still should be a single  
> property as the super-property for all SKOS Core documentation  
> properties.   What if we add a new prop e.g. 'skos:documentation' to  
> SKOS Core to play the role that rdfs:comment currently does?

What's the use-case for this property?

Chaals

Received on Friday, 25 February 2005 15:58:20 UTC