W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > February 2005

Re: SKOS Core review Re: issue: non-Literal "comment" properties Re: new draft of SKOS Core guide

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:49:18 +0100
To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Message-ID: <opsmrfkgs3w5l938@saturne>

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:40:36 -0000, Miles, AJ (Alistair)  
<A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> wrote:

> rdfs:comment does have to go as a super-prop for these props because of  
> its range, but I've been thinking that there still should be a single  
> property as the super-property for all SKOS Core documentation  
> properties.   What if we add a new prop e.g. 'skos:documentation' to  
> SKOS Core to play the role that rdfs:comment currently does?

What's the use-case for this property?

Received on Friday, 25 February 2005 15:58:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:32:05 UTC