- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 04:49:40 -0500
- To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
* Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> [2005-02-24 10:43+0100] > > > I've lately seen messages about SKOS being posted either on public-swbp-wg@w3.org, or > public-esw-thes@w3.org, or both lists like this one. Since SKOS in now on the SWBP table, > and on the W3C Recommendation track, I'm not sure what should be the practice now. I've tended to send detailed comments to public-esw-thes; and more process or workflow or WG-specific things to the WG list. BTW we're not yet agreed we're on track to RECommendation. I'm not sure best way to partition things between lists either fwiw... Dan > > Meanwhile I forward to SWBP two messages I posted lately to public-esw-thes@w3.org only, > well aware that it is not a best practice :) > > Bernard > > ********************************************************************************** > > Bernard Vatant > Senior Consultant > Knowledge Engineering > bernard.vatant@mondeca.com > > "Making Sense of Content" : http://www.mondeca.com > "Everything is a Subject" : http://universimmedia.blogspot.com > > ********************************************************************************** > >
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 09:49:48 UTC