RE: SKOS Core second review

+1 on this from Andy:

> A thesaurus management system could be built using SKOS as 
> the underlying model,
> so I don't necessarily agree that it wouldn't be good 
> practice to produce/maintain
> a thesaurus in SKOS.  However, taking your assumption to be 
> valid, then I would
> say one the reason for keeping these housekeeping aids in the 
> RDF version would
> be for communication with licensees and translators.  SKOS 
> could be used as a
> communication format with these persons and the notes may be 
> useful depending
> upon their needs.
> 
> Andy.
> 
>