RE: SKOS Core second review from Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) on 2005-08-03 (public-esw-thes@w3.org from August 2005)

From: Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 14:56:07 +0100
To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0ACCC8@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk>

+1 on this from Andy:

> A thesaurus management system could be built using SKOS as 
> the underlying model,
> so I don't necessarily agree that it wouldn't be good 
> practice to produce/maintain
> a thesaurus in SKOS.  However, taking your assumption to be 
> valid, then I would
> say one the reason for keeping these housekeeping aids in the 
> RDF version would
> be for communication with licensees and translators.  SKOS 
> could be used as a
> communication format with these persons and the notes may be 
> useful depending
> upon their needs.
> 
> Andy.
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2005 13:56:11 UTC