RE: [Proposal][SKOS-Core] skos:denotes

> Ah I hadn't realize they were expected to be disjoint. I nearly wrote 
> earlier that it you could simply have the bNode 
> Al-as-foaf-Person also be 
> an instance of skos:Concept. Then it could, for example, be directly 
> attached to a thesaurus without this extra level of 
> indirection and use 
> owl:sameAs to indicate these correspondences.

The big problem with doing this is that multiple concepts from different
sources could end up being merged as the same node in a graph ... which
could leave you with a concept node with three different definitions and any
number of labels, and no knowledge (without provenance) of which source the
labels/definitions came from.

Al.