- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:59:45 +0100
- To: 'Dave Reynolds' <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
> Ah I hadn't realize they were expected to be disjoint. I nearly wrote > earlier that it you could simply have the bNode > Al-as-foaf-Person also be > an instance of skos:Concept. Then it could, for example, be directly > attached to a thesaurus without this extra level of > indirection and use > owl:sameAs to indicate these correspondences. The big problem with doing this is that multiple concepts from different sources could end up being merged as the same node in a graph ... which could leave you with a concept node with three different definitions and any number of labels, and no knowledge (without provenance) of which source the labels/definitions came from. Al.
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 16:00:23 UTC