- From: Stella Dextre Clarke <sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:00:25 +0100
- To: "'Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) '" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Could be useful. Mis-spellings can be useful to assist search (provided they are common, unambiguous and distinctive, unlikely to be confused with another preferred term. See our draft BS8723 Part 2) and it is good to be able to keep them separate from normal non-preferred terms Stella ***************************************************** Stella Dextre Clarke Information Consultant Luke House, West Hendred, Wantage, Oxon, OX12 8RR, UK Tel: 01235-833-298 Fax: 01235-863-298 SDClarke@LukeHouse.demon.co.uk ***************************************************** -----Original Message----- From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Miles, AJ (Alistair) Sent: 14 October 2004 17:17 To: 'public-esw-thes@w3.org' Subject: search labels This is just a thought, but what about a property called e.g. 'searchLabel' that allows you to add labels to a concept to aid user search, where you *don't* want those labels to appear among the meaning-defining set of labels for that concept. This could be used e.g. for common mis-spellings of another label. ??? Al. --- Alistair Miles Research Associate CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Building R1 Room 1.60 Fermi Avenue Chilton Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QX United Kingdom Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 17:00:17 UTC