W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > October 2004

who decides on a thesaurus RE: candidate and deprecated concepts

From: <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 03:19:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <57930.218.1.116.124.1097565552.squirrel@homer.w3.org>
To: carlmattocks@checkmi.com
Cc: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>, "Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com>, "Stella Dextre Clarke" <sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk>, "'Miles, AJ (Alistair) '" <a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk>, "'Leonard Will'" <l.will@willpowerinfo.co.uk>, public-esw-thes@w3.org

>
> Chaals :
>
> Clarification accepted with thanks .. but requesting more on the 'forwards
> / backwards compatible lumping'
> (1) within a single thesaurus
>  - same set of author(s) / steward(s) thus same purpose
> (2) a different thesaurus .
> - different (single) set of author(s) / steward(s) different purpose

Well, this is the glory of the semantic web (and what makes it seem
different to traditional systems). You don't really care who the author is
of a second thesaurus - including a thesaurus that is mostly the same as
an original one, with a few terms changed.

This is a consequence of building a system that can work on the Semantic
Web - anyone can say anything about anything, so anyone can make a
thesaurus describing a particular use of some collection of concepts. (See
the notes about etiquette in my reply to Bernard. Some day soon we will be
able to use trust management systems to get stronger control than social
etiquette. But the underlying technical stuff stays the same...)

As Al suggested, if you define a set of concepts (there is no reason not
to include relations between them) at that point, you can then define a
thesaurus using those concepts. Or someone else can build a thesaurus
using the concepts. So you cover either case - and the technical approach
for describing what it means to deprecate the use of a term or concept in
a particular thesaurus doesn't mean that the concept itself magically
vanishes from the universe.

Cheers

Chaals
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2004 07:19:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:32:04 UTC