W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > October 2004

RE: lexical relationships

From: Houghton,Andrew <houghtoa@oclc.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:37:28 -0400
Message-ID: <B56ABE145BEB0C40A265238FCAA420DF03BD4CB9@oa2-server.oa.oclc.org>
To: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>

> From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) [mailto:A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk] 
> Sent: 06 October, 2004 11:20
> Subject: lexical relationships
> 
> 
> This is just to guage interest in doing this kind of thing in 
> SKOS Core ...
> 
> Are we interested in being able to represent things like 
> spelling variant relationships, abbreviation relationships, 
> literal translation relationships, in SKOS Core?
> 
> I group these under the label 'lexical relationships' because 
> they seem different from 'semantic relationships', although a 
> lexical relationship may not be completely independent of the 
> sense of the terms involved.
> 

It is desirable to know the "lexical-ness" of a skos:prefLabel or
skos:altLabel
and would make moving between MARC authorities and SKOS lossless.  For
example
in MARC authorities you can indicate a non-preferred term as an
abbreviation.

I think spelling variants could be handled by xml:lang and transliterations
could be as well, e.g. x-pinyin, but it might be nice to identify a
skos:prefLabel
or skos:altLabel as a transliteration first a let xml:lang indicate the
specific
transliteration.

You could have skos:abbreviation be a sub-class of skos:altLabel, but this
breaks down if you want to indicate that a skos:prefLabel is an
abbreviation.
So this doesn't seem to me to be a sub-class relationship to skos:prefLabel
and
skos:altLabel.


Andy.
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2004 15:37:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:32:04 UTC