> The technical problem is that using frag ids raises issues when you > have a large set of terms and then try to efficiently GET a term's URI > in order to receive a description (or if you would like to > provide term > descriptions at a term's URI). Just to say that, as Dave Reynolds pointed out a little while ago on public-esw-thes list, this is not necessarily true, as you can do things like http://my.org/knowlegebase/chemistry/water#concept http://my.org/knowlegebase/chemistry/ice#concept or http://my.org/knowlegebase/chemistry/water#Water http://my.org/knowlegebase/chemistry/ice#Ice ... see his posting at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Sep/0016.html Not that I'm expressing any sort of opinion on whether hash or slash is best ;) Al. > > >If this has been discussed to death before, please feel free > to tell me > >so and/or provide a pointer to such a discussion. > one related thread ("pound sign vs. slash as final URI delimiter") > starts at [1] > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2004Feb/0117.html > > regards, > benjamin > > -- > Benjamin Nowack > > Kruppstr. 100 > 45145 Essen, Germany > http://www.bnode.org/ > > @ DERI Galway from 2004-10-01 to 2004-12-02 > http://www.deri.ie/ > > > > > > >Cheers, > > > >Jeen > >Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2004 16:58:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:52 GMT