W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > May 2004

RE: Quasi node labels

From: Houghton,Andrew <houghtoa@oclc.org>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:33:49 -0400
Message-ID: <B56ABE145BEB0C40A265238FCAA420DF026F52EB@oa2-server.oa.oclc.org>
To: public-esw-thes@w3.org

> From: Leonard Will [mailto:L.Will@willpowerinfo.co.uk] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 6:17 PM
> Subject: Quasi node labels
> I think that calling it "summary" would confuse the issue, 
> because these terms _do_ in fact represent concepts, and in 
> the AAT for example they can occur at any level. I'd prefer 
> to see them treated as a sub-class of concept, having the 
> restriction that they are not to be used for indexing.

I agree, I thru out "summary" because I couldn't come up with
a better name and hoped someone else could.  I guess I should
have noted that in my message.  I have been debating whether 
these should be a subclass of concept or not.  Regardless of
whether it is or is not, it still would be defined at the
same level as skos:concept.  So if I had:



+-- skos:NodeLabelB

the RDF serialization would still look like:


So it's just a matter of semantics whether you consider it a
subclass or not.  From a serialization point of view they are
exactly at the same level.  One needs to decide whether this 
truly is a subclass of concept.  I think it might be, but I keep
going back an forth on that point.  I'll leave the semantics,
to others, but I do think that SKOS does need to make the
distinction between (a) and (b) as you pointed out.

> >and the current proposal for handling (a).  Although the current 
> >proposal seems odd to me.
> Sorry, but I'm not clear exactly what you mean by "the 
> current proposal" 

I was referring to the original proposal that Miles posted for
comments.  I guess I switched topics without being clear on the
matter.  Sorry for the confusion.


Andrew Houghton, OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2004 18:33:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:32:03 UTC