W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Coverage of SKOS-Core 1.0

From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:56:51 +0100
Message-ID: <405707A3.7060008@virgilio.it>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>

Dan Brickley wrote:

>* Miles, AJ (Alistair)  <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> [2004-03-16 12:41-0000]
>  
>
>>I believe SKOS-Core is suitable for encoding any type of KOS whose
>>fundamental unit may be modelled as a concept.
>>    
>>
>
>What is a concept?
>
>Sorry, had to ask...
>
>(might also ask what a fundamental unit is... what's the fundamental
>unit of RDF? terms? URIs? resources? classes? hard to tell...)
>
>
>  
>
It might be an idea to have a nosey around the SUO [1] and Conceptual 
Graph [2] material for wording of parts like this - they've spent a lot 
of time counting these angels.

Fundamental unit of the  =>Resource<= [hint hint] Description Framework? 
(Mind you, that would probably lead to "Thing Ontology Language")

Cheers,
Danny.

[1] http://suo.ieee.org/
[2] http://www.jfsowa.com/cg/index.htm

>
>  
>
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 08:56:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:52 GMT