I wonder if it is worth considering some achievable milestone dates - often it is hard to structure an ongoing development process without having some timeboxing that allows you to say "Lets punt that decision into the next timeframe" or "Lets try and close some of these open issues". Cheers, Kal On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 15:29, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: > This proposal is in response to the requirement identified in [1]. > > I've written up a suggested SKOS development process on the SkosDev wiki - > see [2]. This wiki > page is entirely the proposal. > > Al. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Jun/0018.html > [2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SkosDev_2fChangeProcess > > > --- > Alistair Miles > Research Associate > CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory > Building R1 Room 1.60 > Fermi Avenue > Chilton > Didcot > Oxfordshire OX11 0QX > United Kingdom > Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk > Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 > -- Kal Ahmed <kal@techquila.com> techquilaReceived on Monday, 28 June 2004 16:35:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:52 GMT