Hmm. So essentailly we expect to be able to change any definition of any part of SKOS? I am not sure that this is a good idea - and in particular I suspect that Concept is actually stable, and probably the {broad,narrow}er* properties... what do you think? Cheers Chaals On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: > >Following on from the proposal [1] to use the term status schema for >managing the SKOS-Core vocab ... > >I propose the following initial term status values for the terms currently >in the SKOS-Core vocab [2]: > >-- CLASSES -- > >ConceptScheme testing >Concept testing >TopConcept unstable > >--PROPERTIES -- [etc] > >Al. > >[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Jul/0013.html >[2] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core.rdfReceived on Thursday, 29 July 2004 01:27:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:52 GMT