W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > July 2004

Re: [Proposal] [SKOS-Core] Initial term_status values

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:27:57 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
Cc: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0407290124560.21862@homer.w3.org>

Hmm. So essentailly we expect to be able to change any definition of any part
of SKOS? I am not sure that this is a good idea - and in particular I suspect
that Concept is actually stable, and probably the {broad,narrow}er*

what do you think?



On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Miles, AJ (Alistair)  wrote:

>Following on from the proposal [1] to use the term status schema for
>managing the SKOS-Core vocab ...
>I propose the following initial term status values for the terms currently
>in the SKOS-Core vocab [2]:
>-- CLASSES --
>ConceptScheme			testing
>Concept				testing
>TopConcept			unstable
>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2004Jul/0013.html
>[2] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core.rdf
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 01:27:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 2 March 2016 13:32:03 UTC